Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to various  
food(s)/food constituent(s) claiming maintenance of joints (ID 1799, 1973,  
2022, 2178, 2202, 2254, 2255, 2311, 2394, 2417, 2418, 2458, 2649, 2794,  
2798, 3119, 3144, 3274, 3283, 3318, 3339, 3495, 3511, 3523, 3555, 3624,  
3699, 3748, 3770, 3835, 3884, 3892, 3904, 3943, 3978, 4012, 4020, 4056,  
4137, 4175), maintenance of bone (ID 1764, 1907, 2418, 4012, 4020, 4056,  
4175) and maintenance of muscles (ID 2254, 2311) pursuant to Article 13(1)  
of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006[sup]1[/sup]  
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)2, 3  
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy  
Słowa kluczowe:
Joints
 
bone
 
health claims
 
muscles
 
	
	2. Znaczenie oświadczenia dla zdrowia człowieka
	
        
		
		
	
	
    
	
	
		
			
1.1. Utrzymanie prawidłowego stanu stawów (ID 1799, 1973, 2022, 2178, 2202, 2254, 2255, 2311, 2394, 2417,  2418, 2458, 2649, 2794, 2798, 3119, 3144, 3274, 3283, 3318, 3339, 3495, 3511, 3523, 3555, 3624, 3699, 3748, 3770, 3835, 3884, 3892, 3904, 3943, 3978, 4012, 4020, 4056, 4137, 4175)
	
	
			The claimed effects are "joint health/mobility/comfort", "joints", "joint support", "helps to maintain  mobility of joint during and after climacterium", "contributes to physical well-being". The Panel assumes  that the target population is the general population for all claims except for ID 3144, for which the  Panel assumes that the target population is post-menopausal women.
In the context of the proposed wordings, the Panel assumes that the claimed effects refer to the  maintenance of normal joints.
The Panel considers that maintenance of normal joints is a beneficial physiological effect.
	
    
			
	
		
			
1.2. Utrzymanie prawidłowego stanu kości (ID 1764, 1907, 2418, 4012, 4020, 4056, 4175)
	
	
			The claimed effects are "bone" and "bone health". The Panel assumes that the target population is the  general population.
In the context of the proposed wordings, the Panel assumes that the claimed effects refer to the  maintenance of normal bone.
The Panel considers that maintenance of normal bone is a beneficial physiological effect.
	
    
			
	
		
			
1.3. Utrzymanie prawidłowego stanu mięśni (ID 2254, 2311)
	
	
			The claimed effect is "muscle". The Panel assumes that the target population is the general  population.
In the context of the proposed wordings, the Panel assumes that the claimed effect refers to the  maintenance of normal muscles.
The Panel considers that maintenance of normal muscles is a beneficial physiological effect.
	
    
			
	
		
 
	
	3. Naukowe uzasadnienia wpływu na zdrowie człowieka
	
        
		Most of the references provided addressed food(s)/food constituent(s) other than those for which the  specific claims are proposed, and/or claimed effects unrelated to the structure and/or function of  joints, bone and muscles. This literature includes general reviews on the "antioxidant" or "anti- inflammatory" properties of food(s)/food constituent(s) used in certain countries in the management  of medical conditions associated with acute or chronic joint damage of either inflammatory or  degenerative origin (e.g. osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, arthritis of infectious  origin). The Panel considers that no scientific conclusions can be drawn from these references for the  substantiation of the claims.
		
	
	
    
	
	
		
			
2.1. Utrzymanie prawidłowego stanu stawów (ID 1799, 1973, 2022, 2178, 2202, 2254, 2255, 2311, 2394, 2417,  2418, 2458, 2649, 2794, 2798, 3119, 3144, 3274, 3283, 3318, 3339, 3495, 3511, 3523, 3555,  3624, 3699, 3748, 3770, 3835, 3884, 3892, 3904, 3943, 3978, 4012, 4020, 4056, 4137, 4175)
	
	
			No  human studies investigating the effects of the food(s)/food constituent(s) on the maintenance of  normal joints have been provided in relation to any of the health claims evaluated in this section.
Some human intervention studies investigating the effects of the food(s)/food constituent(s) on the  treatment of osteoarthrosis or (osteo)arthritis of different origin (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic  arthritis, arthritis of infectious origin) were submitted. The Panel considers that the evidence provided  does not establish that patients with osteoarthrosis or (osteo)arthritis of different origin are  representative of the general population with regard to the status of joint tissues, or that results  obtained in studies on subjects with osteoarthrosis or (osteo)arthritis of different origin relating to the  treatment of symptoms of these diseases (e.g. erosion of articular cartilage, reduced mobility of joints)  can be extrapolated to the maintenance of normal joints in the general population. Thus, for claims  supported only by references to human studies on patients with osteoarthrosis or (osteo)arthritis of  different origin, the Panel considers that a cause and effect relationship has not been established  between the consumption of the food(s)/food constituent(s) and the claimed effect in the general  population.
A number of in vitro studies were provided addressing the effects of different food(s)/food  constituent(s) on human chondrocytes/cartilage explants and chondrocyte cell lines. Also, studies  were provided on the relationship between the intake of the food(s)/food constituent(s) and the  claimed effect in animal models of experimentally-induced arthritis. The Panel considers that the  evidence provided in the animal and in vitro studies submitted is not sufficient to predict the  occurrence of an effect of the food(s)/food constituent(s) on the maintenance of normal joints in vivo  in humans. The Panel considers that while effects shown in animal and in vitro studies may be used as  supportive evidence, human studies are required for substantiation of a claim. Thus, for claims  supported by references to animal studies and/or in vitro studies only, the Panel considers that a cause  and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of the food(s)/food  constituent(s) and the claimed effect.
The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the  consumption of the food(s)/food constituent(s) evaluated in this section and the maintenance of  normal joints.
	
    
			
	
		
			
2.2. Utrzymanie prawidłowego stanu kości (ID 1764, 1907, 2418, 4012, 4020, 4056, 4175)
	
	
			No intervention studies in humans investigating the effects of the food(s)/food constituent(s) on bone  in healthy subjects have been provided in relation to any of the health claims evaluated in this section.
A number of in vitro studies were provided addressing the effects of different food(s)/food  constituent(s) on human osteoblast/osteoclast cell lines. Also, studies were provided on the
relationship between the intake of the food(s)/food constituent(s) and the claimed effect in animal  models of experimentally-induced osteoporosis. The Panel considers that the evidence provided in the  animal and in vitro studies submitted is not sufficient to predict the occurrence of an effect of the  food(s)/food constituent(s) on the maintenance of normal bone in vivo in humans. The Panel considers  that while effects shown in animal and in vitro studies may be used as supportive evidence, human  studies are required for substantiation of a claim. Thus, for claims supported by references to animal  studies and/or in vitro studies only, the Panel considers that a cause and effect relationship has not  been established between the consumption of the food(s)/food constituent(s) and the claimed effect.
The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the  consumption of the food(s)/food constituent(s) evaluated in this section and the maintenance of  normal bone.
	
    
			
	
		
			
2.3. Utrzymanie prawidłowego stanu mięśni (ID 2254, 2311)
	
	
			No studies investigating the effects of the food(s)/food constituent(s) on muscle outcomes have been  provided in relation to any of the health claims evaluated in this section.
The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the  consumption of the food(s)/food constituent(s) evaluated in this section and the maintenance of  normal muscles.
	
    
			
	
		
 
Wnioski
	
		On the basis of the data presented, the Panel concludes that:  
Maintenance of joints (ID 1799, 1973, 2022, 2178, 2202, 2254, 2255, 2311, 2394, 2417, 2418, 2458, 2649, 2794, 2798, 3119, 3144, 3274, 3283, 3318, 3339, 3495, 3511, 3523, 3555, 3624, 3699, 3748, 3770, 3835, 3884, 3892, 3904, 3943, 3978, 4012, 4020, 4056, 4137, 4175)
The claimed effects are ―joint health/mobility/comfort‖, ―joints‖, ―joint support‖, ―helps to  maintain mobility of joint during and after climacterium‖, ―contributes to physical well- being‖. The target population is assumed to be the general population for all claims except for  ID 3144, for which the target population is assumed to be post-menopausal women.  Maintenance of normal joints is a beneficial physiological effect.  
A cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of the  food(s)/food constituent(s) evaluated in this section and the maintenance of normal joints.  
Maintenance of bone (ID 1764, 1907, 2418, 4012, 4020, 4056, 4175)  
The claimed effects are ―bone‖ and ―bone health‖. The target population is assumed to be the  general population. Maintenance of normal bone is a beneficial physiological effect.  
A cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of the  food(s)/food constituent(s) evaluated in this section and the maintenance of normal bone.  
Maintenance of muscles (ID 2254, 2311)  
The claimed effect is ―muscle‖. The target population is assumed to be the general  population. Maintenance of normal muscles is a beneficial physiological effect.  
A cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of the  food(s)/food constituent(s) evaluated in this section and the maintenance of normal muscles.