Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to folate  
and maintenance of normal blood pressure (ID 176) pursuant to Article  
13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006[sup]1[/sup]  
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)2, 3  
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy  
Słowa kluczowe:
Folate
 
blood pressure
 
health claims
 
	
	1. Charakterystyka żywności / składnika
	
        
            
            - 
            
                Utrzymanie prawidłowego ciśnienia krwi
                
            
            
 
            
        
		The food constituent that is the subject of the health claim is calcium L-methylfolate.
Calcium-L-methylfolate is a synthetic folate compound used in food supplements and food  fortification; it is synthesised by reduction of folic acid to tetrahydrofolic acid followed by  methylation and diastereoselective crystallisation (in water) of L-methylfolate as its calcium salt.
In the context of the references provided, the Panel assumes that the food constituent that is the  subject of the claim is folate, which is the generic name for a number of derivatives of  pteroylglutamic acid (PGA, folic acid). Natural (dietary) folates are mostly reduced folates, i.e.  derivatives of tetrahydrofolate (THF) (SCF, 2000).
Different forms of folate, including calcium-L-methylfolate, are authorised for addition to foods  (Annex II of the Regulation (EC) No 1925/20066 and Annex II of Directive 2002/46/EC7). This  evaluation applies to folate naturally present in foods and those forms authorised for addition to foods  (Annex II of the Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 and Annex II of Directive 2002/46/EC).
The Panel considers that the food constituent, folate, which is the subject of the health claim, is  sufficiently characterised.
		
	
	
    
	
	
		
 
	
	2. Znaczenie oświadczenia dla zdrowia człowieka
	
        
            
            - 
            
                Utrzymanie prawidłowego ciśnienia krwi
                
            
            
 
            
        
		The claimed effect is “cardiovascular health”. The Panel assumes the target population is the general  population.
In the context of the proposed wordings, the Panel assumes that the claimed effect relates to the  maintenance of normal blood pressure.
Blood pressure is the pressure (force per unit area) exerted by circulating blood on the walls of blood  vessels. Elevated blood pressure, by convention above 140 mmHg (systolic) and/or 90 mmHg  (diastolic), may compromise the normal arterial and cardiac function.
The Panel considers that maintenance of normal blood pressure is a beneficial physiological effect.
		
	
	
    
	
	
		
 
	
	3. Naukowe uzasadnienia wpływu na zdrowie człowieka - Utrzymanie prawidłowego ciśnienia krwi
	
        
            
            - 
            
                Utrzymanie prawidłowego ciśnienia krwi
                
            
            
 
            
        
		The majority of the references provided for the scientific substantiation of the claim included  narrative reviews which did not contain original data that could be used for the scientific  substantiation of the claim. Most of the human studies provided did not contain data on folate (or  calcium L-methylfolate) intake, assessed the effects of folate or folic acid in combination with other  food constituents (e.g. vitamin B6, vitamin E), or addressed health outcomes other than blood  pressure (e.g. folate kinetics, homocysteine concentrations in relation to the risk of coronary heart  disease and stroke, risk of cardiovascular disease, the MTHFR 677C→T polymorphism in relation to  the risk of coronary heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, endothelial function, arterial stiffness  and compliance, common carotid intima-media thickness, antioxidant status, markers of oxidative  stress, insulin resistance, parameters of coronary blood circulation). The Panel considers that no  conclusions can be drawn from these references for the scientific substantiation of the claim.
Two double-blind, randomised, controlled, parallel group intervention studies investigated the effects  of 5 mg folic acid daily for 3-4 weeks on blood pressure in cigarette smokers and in subjects with  normal or high normal blood pressure (Mangoni et al., 2002; Williams et al., 2005). The Panel notes  that these studies used daily doses of folic acid five times above the Tolerable Upper Intake Level
(UL) for adults (1,000 g) (SCF, 2000) and more than ten times the doses proposed in the conditions
of use for this claim (400 g). The Panel considers that no conclusions can be drawn from these  references for the scientific substantiation of the claim.
Forman et al. (2005) prospectively examined the association between folate intake and risk of incident  hypertension in two large cohorts of younger and older women who were followed for eight years.  The study cohorts consisted of 93,803 women aged 27 to 44 years in the Nurses' Health Study II  (1991-1999) and 62,260 older women aged 43 to 70 years in the Nurses' Health Study I (1990-1998),  and who did not have a history of hypertension. Baseline information on dietary folate and  supplemental folic acid intakes was derived from semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaires and  was updated every four years. The outcome variable was relative risk of incident self-reported  hypertension during the eight years of follow-up. After adjusting for multiple potential confounders,
younger women who consumed at least 1,000 g/day of total folate (dietary plus supplemental intake)  had a decreased risk of hypertension (relative risk [RR] 0.54; 95% CI = 0.45-0.66; p for trend <0.001)
compared with those who consumed less than 200 g/day. For older women the RR was 0.82 (95% CI  = 0.69-0.97; p for trend = 0.05) for the same comparison. The Panel notes that incident hypertension  was self-reported, and that dietary intake data were collected by semi-quantitative food frequency  questionnaires.
In weighing the evidence, the Panel took into account that no human intervention studies from which  conclusions could be drawn on an effect of folate intake on blood pressure were provided, and that  two large prospective cohort studies which addressed the association between folate intake and  incident hypertension in women had substantial weaknesses as the incidence of hypertension was self- reported and folate intake data (from diet and supplements) were collected by semi-quantitative food  frequency questionnaires.
The Panel concludes that a cause and effects relationship has not been established between the dietary  intake of folate and maintenance of normal blood pressure.
		
	
	
    
	
	
		
 
Wnioski
	
		On the basis of the data presented, the Panel concludes that:  
The food constituent, folate, which is the subject of the health claim is sufficiently  characterised.  
The claimed effect is “cardiovascular health”. The target population is assumed to be the  general population. Maintenance of normal blood pressure is a beneficial physiological effect.  
A cause and effect relationship has not been established between the dietary intake of folate  and maintenance of normal blood pressure.