Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to  
Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (AGAL NM97/09514) and decreasing  
potentially pathogenic intestinal microorganisms (ID 908) pursuant to  
Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006[sup]1[/sup]  
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)2  
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy  
Słowa kluczowe:
Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (AGAL NM97/09514)
 
gut health
 
health claims
 
intestinal flora
 
potentially pathogenic microorganisms
 
	
	1. Charakterystyka żywności / składnika
	
        
            
            - 
            
                Zmniejszenie ilość potencjalnie patogennych bakterii jelitowych
                
            
            
 
            
        
		The food constituent that is the subject of the health claim is Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 AGAL  NM97/09514 (hereafter L. rhamnosus HN001 AGAL NM97/09514). The strain L. rhamnosus HN001  (also known as L. rhamnosus DR20) species identity as well as the strain identity and characteristics  have been determined using phenotypic and genotypic methods as indicated in the references  provided (Prasad et al., 1998). The Panel notes that a culture collection number from the Australian  Government Analytical Laboratories (AGAL) is provided. The AGAL is a restricted-access non- public International Depositary Authority under the Budapest Treaty.
The Panel considers that the food constituent, Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001  (AGAL NM97/09514), which is the subject of the health claim, is sufficiently characterised.
		
	
	
    
	
	
		
 
	
	2. Znaczenie oświadczenia dla zdrowia człowieka
	
        
            
            - 
            
                Zmniejszenie ilość potencjalnie patogennych bakterii jelitowych
                
            
            
 
            
        
		The claimed effect is “gut health”. The Panel assumes that the target population is the general  population.
“Gut health” is not sufficiently defined. In the context of the proposed wording, the Panel assumes  that the claimed effect refers to aspects of: “probiotic, improve the level of natural good bacteria,  maintain the balance of a healthy microflora, and beneficially affect the intestinal flora”.
The numbers/proportions of bacterial groups that would constitute a “balanced/healthy intestinal  flora” have not been established. Increasing the number of any groups of bacteria is not in itself  considered as beneficial. The Panel considers that no evidence has been provided that aspects of the  claimed effect, “probiotic” and “improve the level of natural good bacteria”, are beneficial to human  health.
The Panel considers that “maintain the balance of a healthy microflora/beneficially affect the  intestinal flora” in the context of decreasing potentially pathogenic intestinal microorganisms might  be beneficial to human health.
		
	
	
    
	
	
		
 
	
	3. Naukowe uzasadnienia wpływu na zdrowie człowieka - Zmniejszenie ilość potencjalnie patogennych bakterii jelitowych
	
        
            
            - 
            
                Zmniejszenie ilość potencjalnie patogennych bakterii jelitowych
                
            
            
 
            
        
		Thirty-two references were cited to substantiate the claimed effect.
One reference refers to a human intervention study (Tannock et al., 2000). The study evaluates the  effect of six months intervention with daily consumption of 1.6 × 109 cfu Lactobacillus rhamnosus  DR20 (also known as L. rhamnosus HN001) on intestinal microbiota composition of ten healthy  volunteers. Survival of the strain during gastrointestinal transit and counts of intestinal lactobacilli  and enterococci levels were reported. The intervention did not affect other faecal biochemical or  bacteriological factors, including potentially pathogenic intestinal microorganisms.
The other references provided include reviews, numerous in vitro studies focusing on strain  identification/characterisation and in vitro safety evaluation and animal studies assessing safety as  well as studies on the effects of the strain on infection after oral challenge experiments, and one study  related to examination of lactobacillus colonisation in infants. The Panel notes that these references  did not provide any scientific data that could be used to substantiate the claimed effect.
The Panel notes that none of the references provided evidence for a relationship between the  consumption of Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (AGAL NM97/09514) and decreasing potentially  pathogenic intestinal microorganisms.
The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the  consumption of L. rhamnosus HN001 (AGAL NM97/09514) and decreasing potentially pathogenic  intestinal microorganisms.
		
	
	
    
	
	
		
 
Wnioski
	
		On the basis of the data available, the Panel concludes that:  
The food constituent, Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (AGAL NM97/09514), which is the  subject of the health claim, is sufficiently characterised.  
The claimed effect is “gut health. The target population is assumed to be the general  population. Decreasing potentially pathogenic intestinal microorganisms might be beneficial  to human health.  
A cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of  L. rhamnosus HN001 (AGAL NM97/09514) and decreasing potentially pathogenic intestinal  microorganisms.