Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to peanuts,  
peanut oil and peanut butter manufactured exclusively from roasted  
peanuts, and maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations  
(ID 1284) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006[sup]1[/sup]  
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)2, 3  
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy  
Słowa kluczowe:
LDL-cholesterol
 
Peanut
 
health claims
 
peanut butter
 
peanut oil
 
	
	1. Charakterystyka żywności / składnika
	
        
            
            - 
            
                Utrzymanie prawidłowego stężenia cholesterolu LDL we krwi
                
            
            
 
            
        
		The foods that are the subject of the health claim are peanuts, peanut oil and peanut butter.
Peanuts are seeds of the groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) belonging to the legume bean family.  Peanuts and peanut oil contain about 49 % fat by weight (of which about 14 % are saturated fatty  acids (SFAs), 51 % are monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) (mostly oleic acid) and 33 % are  polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) (mostly linoleic acid)), 16 % carbohydrates, 9 % fibre and 25 %  protein.
Peanut butter is manufactured from roasted peanuts. Its composition may vary and it may contain  added palm oil or partially hydrogenated vegetable oil. For peanut butter manufactured from roasted  peanuts only, the fatty acid composition depicted above applies.
The Panel considers that whereas peanut butter, which is not manufactured exclusively from roasted  peanuts is not sufficiently characterised in relation to the claimed effect because of its unknown fatty  acid composition, the foods, peanuts, peanut oil and peanut butter manufactured exclusively from  roasted peanuts, which are the subject of the health claim, are sufficiently characterised in relation to  the claimed effect.
		
	
	
    
	
	
		
 
	
	2. Znaczenie oświadczenia dla zdrowia człowieka
	
        
            
            - 
            
                Utrzymanie prawidłowego stężenia cholesterolu LDL we krwi
                
            
            
 
            
        
		The claimed effect is “helps achieve normal cholesterol levels by reducing blood total and LDL- cholesterol and thereby promoting heart health”. The Panel assumes that the target population is the  general population.
Low-density lipoproteins (LDL) carry cholesterol from the liver to peripheral tissues, including the  arteries. Elevated LDL-cholesterol, by convention >160 mg/dL (>4.1 mmol/L), may compromise the  normal structure and function of the arteries.
The Panel considers that maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations is a beneficial  physiological effect.
		
	
	
    
	
	
		
 
	
	3. Naukowe uzasadnienia wpływu na zdrowie człowieka - Utrzymanie prawidłowego stężenia cholesterolu LDL we krwi
	
        
            
            - 
            
                Utrzymanie prawidłowego stężenia cholesterolu LDL we krwi
                
            
            
 
            
        
		Most of the references provided reported on the effects of different diets, some of which included  peanuts (low vs. high fat diets, low SFAs, high MUFAs, high PUFAs, low/high in carbohydrates) or  of foods other than peanuts (e.g. avocado, nuts in general or nuts other than peanuts) on different  health outcomes (including blood cholesterol) which do not allow an assessment of the effects of  peanut consumption (independently of other dietary manipulations) on blood cholesterol  concentrations. Some references were narrative reviews which did not contain any primary data which  could be used to substantiate the claim. The Panel considers that no conclusions can be drawn from  these references for the scientific substantiation of the claimed effect.
Three intervention studies in humans on the effects of peanut consumption on blood cholesterol  concentrations were provided (Alper and Mattes, 2003; Kris-Etherton et al., 1999; O'Byrne et al.,  1997). The Panel notes that the study by Alper and Mattes (2003) lacked a control intervention, and  considers that no conclusions can be drawn from this study for the scientific substantiation of the  claimed effect.
Kris-Etherton et al. (1999) compared the effects of an Average American Diet (AAD) with those of  four cholesterol-lowering diets on blood lipids in 22 normocholesterolaemic subjects following a  randomised, double-blind, five-period cross-over study design: an American Heart  Association/National Cholesterol Education Program Step II diet and three MUFA-rich diets (olive oil  (OO), peanut oil (PO), and peanuts and peanut butter (PPB)). The AAD, OO, PO and PPB diets were  controlled for total fat (about 34 %), but the AAD was higher in SFAs (16 %) than the OO, PO and  PPB diets (about 7 %). MUFA content in the AAD (11 %) and the Step II (12 %) diet was lower than  in the three MUFA-rich diets (17-21 %). PUFAs were 9-10 % in the peanut diets and 6-7 % in the  remaining three diets. Each diet was consumed for 24 days with wash-out periods of 4-11 days in  between. All four intervention diets (the Step II and the three MUFA-rich diets) significantly  decreased LDL-cholesterol concentrations when compared to the AAD diet, with no significant  differences between the diets. The Panel notes that the effects of MUFAs on blood cholesterol  concentrations may have been due to the replacement of SFAs. The Panel also notes that the OO, PO  and PPB diets, which were controlled for their fatty acid composition, had similar effects on blood  cholesterol concentrations.
In the study by O'Byrne et al. (1997), 20 postmenopausal hypercholesterolaemic women who  previously consumed “high-fat” diets (34 E%, 11 E% SFA) were placed on a “low-fat”  monounsaturated acid-rich diet (26 E%, 14 E% MUFA) for six months. Peanuts were the main source  of MUFAs in the MUFA-rich diet, where subjects consumed 35-68 g per day of peanuts. Peanuts  replaced about 28 g of lean cooked meat and 3-4 servings of oil or margarine. Sixteen women eating  low-fat diets (24 E%) were also followed to monitor variations in serum lipids caused by seasonal  variations. A total of 25 women completed the study (12 in the MUFA-rich diet and 13 in the low-fat  control diet). Total fat intake was 26 E% in the peanut diet and 17 E% in the low-fat diet. This  difference was accounted for by a higher intake of MUFAs in the peanut diet (14 % vs. 6 % of total  energy). In women consuming the peanut diet, serum total cholesterol concentrations decreased by  7.4 % and LDL-cholesterol concentrations decreased by 9 % compared to the low-fat group (as  calculated by Mukuddem-Petersen et al., 2005). The Panel notes that this study was not randomised,  that intervention and control groups were not comparable at baseline with respect to body weight or  blood cholesterol concentrations, and that the peanut diet group lost significantly more weight (about  3 kg) than the low-fat diet group during the intervention, which could explain at least in part the  differences between groups with respect to changes in blood cholesterol concentrations. The Panel  considers that only limited conclusions can be drawn from this study for the scientific substantiation  of the claimed effect.
In weighing the evidence, the Panel took into account that the evidence provided did not establish that  consumption of peanuts has an effect on blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations beyond what could be
expected from the fatty acid composition of peanuts, that the cholesterol-lowering effect of peanuts  could be attributed to the content of MUFAs and PUFAs in peanuts, and that part of the effect is due  to the replacement of mixtures of SFAs in the diet by MUFAs and PUFAs, which are the prevalent  fatty acids in peanuts.
The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the  consumption of peanuts, peanut oil and peanut butter manufactured exclusively from roasted peanuts,  and maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations beyond what could be expected  from the fatty acid composition of peanuts.
A claim on the replacement of mixtures of SFAs with cis-MUFAs and/or cis-PUFAs in foods or diets  and maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations has been assessed with a  favourable outcome (EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products Nutrition and Allergies (NDA), 2011).
A claim on linoleic acid and maintenance of normal blood cholesterol concentrations has also already  been assessed with a favourable outcome (EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products Nutrition and Allergies  (NDA), 2009).
		
	
	
    
	
	
		
 
Wnioski
	
		On the basis of the data presented, the Panel concludes that:  
Whereas peanut butter which is not manufactured exclusively from roasted peanuts is not  sufficiently characterised in relation to the claimed effect because of its unknown fatty acid  composition, the foods, peanuts, peanut oil and peanut butter manufactured exclusively from  roasted peanuts, which are the subject of the health claim, are sufficiently characterised in  relation to the claimed effect.  
The claimed effect is “helps achieve normal cholesterol levels by reducing blood total and  LDL-cholesterol and thereby promoting heart health”. The target population is assumed to be  the general population. Maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations is a  beneficial physiological effect.  
A cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of peanuts,  peanut oil and peanut butter manufactured exclusively from roasted peanuts, and maintenance  of normal blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations beyond what could be expected from the  fatty acid composition of peanuts.   
A claim on the replacement of mixtures of SFAs with cis-MUFAs and/or cis-PUFAs in foods  or diets and maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations has already been  assessed with a favourable outcome. A claim on linoleic acid and maintenance of normal  blood cholesterol concentrations has also already been assessed with a favourable outcome.