ID 789 -
	
		
			Częściowo hydrolizowana guma guar
		
		
		
	 
PL: Częściowo hydrolizowana guma guar
EN: Partially Hydrolysed Guar Gum (PHGG)
Pdf: partially hydrolysed guar gum
 
	Oświadczenie (2)
	
		
			-  odpowiedzi glikemicznej
 
		
			-  po posiłku poziom glukozy we krwi
 
		
			-  przyczynia się do obniżenia poziomu cukru
 
		
	
 
        
        
                
1. Charakterystyka żywności / składnika
                
                
                    The food that is subject of the health claim is partially hydrolysed guar gum (PHGG), which is  produced from guar gum by digestion with D-mannanase. It has a lower viscosity and a molecular  weight of 20 kDa. PHGG is not naturally occurring in foods and is usually consumed in the form of  food supplements. PHGG can be measured in foods by established methods.  
The Panel considers that the food constituent, partially hydrolysed guar gum, which is the subject of  the health claims is sufficiently characterised.   
                 
                 
	        
        
        
        
        
                
2.5. Zmniejszenie stężenia glukozy we krwi po posiłku (ID 789, 2932)
                
                
                    The claimed effects are “glycaemic response” and “postprandial blood glucose”. The Panel assumes  that the target population is subjects willing to reduce their post-prandial glycaemic responses.  
In the context of the proposed wording “contributes to lower the glycaemic response”, the Panel notes  that the claimed effect relates to the reduction of post-prandial glycaemic responses.   
Postprandial glycaemia is interpreted as the elevation of blood glucose concentrations after  consumption of a food and/or meal. This function is a normal physiological response that varies in  magnitude and duration and may be influenced by the chemical and physical nature of the food or  meal consumed, as well as by individual factors (Venn and Green, 2007). The evidence provided does  not establish that decreasing post-prandial glycaemic responses in subjects with normal glucose  tolerance is a beneficial physiological effect. However, it may be beneficial to subjects with impaired  glucose tolerance as long as post-prandial insulinaemic responses are not disproportionally increased.  Impaired glucose tolerance is common in the general population of adults.  
The Panel considers that the reduction of post-prandial glycaemic responses may be a beneficial  physiological effect. 
                 
                 
	        
        
        
        
        
                
3.5. Zmniejszenie stężenia glukozy we krwi po posiłku (ID 789, 2932)
                
                
                    A total of 14 publications were cited in relation to the proposed claims. The references provided  included one animal feeding study (Suzuki and Hara, 2004) along with intervention studies and  reviews on the health effects of dietary fibre in general, on the health effects of specific fibres other  than PHGG (e.g., guar gum), on the health effects of foods with a low glycaemic index, and on the  effects of PHGG on health outcomes unrelated to the reduction of post-prandial responses (e.g., blood  lipids). The Panel considers that no scientific conclusions can be drawn from these references for the  substantiation of the claim. The text of one article was only available in Chinese (Gu et al., 2003) and  the English translation was not available to the Panel.  
Only two of the studies cited investigated the effects of PHGG on post-prandial glycaemic responses.  Golay et al. (1995) examined the effect of PHGG in combination with fructose incorporated into a  liquid meal on post-prandial glucose and insulin concentrations in six type 2 diabetic patients. The  Panel notes that four of the subjects were treated with oral anti-diabetic therapy. The Panel considers  that results from pharmacologically treated type 2 diabetic subjects cannot be extrapolated to the  general population.  
In the randomised cross over intervention study by Trinidad (2004), eleven healthy subjects and nine  type 2 diabetic subjects under dietetic management consumed as a reference 50 g of available  carbohydrate from white bread (100 g) and on separate occasions increasing amounts of PHGG (3, 5,  10 and 15 g) either in white bread, added to rice or dissolved in 250 mL water and taken as a drink  with white bread. Capillary blood samples were taken before and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes  after consumption of the test products in normal subjects or before and 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180  minutes after consumption of the test products in diabetic subjects. Whilst increasing amounts of  PHGG significantly decreased the area under the plasma glucose curve in a dose-dependent manner in 
diabetic subjects, it was not reduced significantly in non-diabetic subjects. The Panel notes the lack of  control for a volume effect (it was not reported whether 250 mL of water was consumed in all  conditions) and that insulin responses were not assessed. The Panel considers that no scientific  conclusions can be drawn from this study in relation to the claimed effect.  
In weighing the evidence, the Panel took into account that no conclusions could be drawn for the  substantiation of the claim from any of the cited studies which examined the effect of PHGG on post- prandial glycaemic responses.  
The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the  consumption of PHGG and reduction of post-prandial glycaemic responses.  
                 
                 
	        
        
Warunki i możliwe ograniczenia stosowania oświadczenia
AI for total fiber (IOM): 26-38 g/day
(ideally 8.5-12.5 g/day soluble fiber)