ID 2964 -
	
		
			Lactobacillus paracasei LMG P-22043
		
		
		
	 
PL: Lactobacillus paracasei LMG P-22043
EN: Lactobacillus paracasei LMG P-22043
Pdf: Lactobacillus paracasei LMG P-22043
 
	Oświadczenie (2)
	
		
			-  zdrowe lub korzystnej flory jelitowej
 
		
			-  flory jelitowej
 
		
	
 
        
        
                
1. Charakterystyka żywności / składnika
                
                
                    The food constituent that is the subject of the health claims is Lactobacillus paracasei LMG P-22043.  
Reference to the identification/characterisation of the strain Lactobacillus paracasei LMG P-22043,  also known as L. paracasei IMPC 2.1 (Lavermicocca et al., 2004), is included or cited in the studies  provided as reference material (Lavermicocca et al., 2004; 2005). The strain has been  identified/characterised by PCR, REP-PCR, ARDRA and 16S rRNA-gene sequencing (sequence  deposited in Genbank with accession number EU187503).  
A culture collection number from the BCCM/LMG (Belgian Co-ordinated Collections of  Microorganisms) culture collection is provided. In the BCCM/LMG, which is a non-public  International Depositary Authority under the Budapest Treaty, cultures can also be deposited in a  restricted-access collection as patent deposits.   
The Panel considers that the food constituent, Lactobacillus paracasei LMG P-22043, which is the  subject of the health claims, is sufficiently characterised.  
                 
                 
	        
        
        
        
        
                
2.1. Zmniejszenie ilości potencjalnie patogennych mikroorganizmów przewodu pokarmowego (ID 2964)
                
                
                    The claimed effect is “intestinal flora”. The Panel assumes that the target population is the general  population.  
In the context of the proposed wording, the Panel assumes that the claimed effect refers to changing  the number of gastro-intestinal microorganisms.   
The numbers/proportions of bacterial groups which would constitute a “healthy or beneficial  intestinal flora” have not been established. Increasing the number of any groups of microorganisms is  not in itself considered to be a beneficial physiological effect. The Panel considers that the evidence  
provided does not establish that increasing numbers of gastro-intestinal microorganisms is a beneficial  
physiological effect.  
The Panel considers that decreasing potentially pathogenic gastro-intestinal microorganisms might be  a beneficial physiological effect.  
                 
                 
	        
        
        
        
                
2.2. Zmniejszenie dolegliwości ze strony przewodu pokarmowego (ID 2964)
                
                
                    The claimed effect is “intestinal flora”. The Panel assumes that the target population is the general  population.  
In the context of the clarifications provided by Member States, the Panel assumes that the claimed  effect refers to the reduction of gastro-intestinal discomfort.   
The Panel considers that reduction of gastro-intestinal discomfort is a beneficial physiological effect.  
                 
                 
	        
        
        
        
        
                
3.1. Zmniejszenie ilości potencjalnie patogennych mikroorganizmów przewodu pokarmowego (ID 2964)
                
                
                    A total of five references were cited in relation to this claim. One was a letter from an authoritative  body about the enrichment of vegetable products with “probiotics” and their labelling. Three  references were not related to the claimed effect, i.e. one review and one in vitro study described the  suitability of vegetable carriers to deliver “probiotic” species into the human gastro-intestinal tract  and one paper reported on the in vitro and in vivo survival and transit tolerance of “probiotic” strains  carried by artichokes in the gastro-intestinal tract. The Panel considers that no conclusions can be  drawn from these references for the scientific substantiation of the claimed effect.  
An in vitro study screened the antagonistic activity of various Lactobacillus strains, including  L. paracasei LMG P-22043, against the ureolytic pathogen Yersinia enterocolitica. The Panel  considers that while effects shown in in vitro studies may be used as supportive evidence, human  studies are required for the substantiation of a claim, and that evidence provided in in vitro studies  alone is not sufficient to predict the occurrence of an effect of L. paracasei LMG P-22043  consumption on decreasing potentially pathogenic gastro-intestinal microorganisms in humans.  
No human studies were provided which addressed outcomes related to the claimed effect.  
The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the  consumption of Lactobacillus paracasei LMG P-22043 and decreasing potentially pathogenic  gastro-intestinal microorganisms.  
                 
                 
	        
        
        
        
                
3.2. Zmniejszenie dolegliwości ze strony przewodu pokarmowego (ID 2964)
                
                
                    A total of five references were cited in relation to this claim (see also section 3.1). None of the  references addressed outcomes related to gastro-intestinal discomfort. The Panel considers that no  conclusions can be drawn from these references for the scientific substantiation of the claimed effect.  
The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the  consumption of Lactobacillus paracasei LMG P-22043 and reduction of gastro-intestinal discomfort. 
                 
                 
	        
        
Warunki i możliwe ograniczenia stosowania oświadczenia
At least 1x109 cfu/day