ID 1164 -
	
		
			Suszone śliwki
		
		
		
	 
PL: Suszone śliwki
EN: Prunes (dried plums)
Pdf: 
 
	Oświadczenie (2)
	
		
			-  normalne funkcjonowanie jelit / normal funkcji przewodu pokarmowego / normal okrężnicy funkcji
 
		
			-  utrzymanie regularności jelit, działanie przeczyszczające
 
		
	
 
        
        
                
1. Charakterystyka żywności / składnika
                
                
                    The food that is the subject of the health claim is prunes (dried plums of „prune‟ cultivars (Prunus  domestica L.)).
The content in prunes of water, total carbohydrates, protein, fat and amino acids, as well as a number  of different sugars, minerals, vitamins, carotenoids, organic acids, and phenolic compounds, is given  in the literature (Dikeman et al., 2004; Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis et al., 2001). The composition with  regard to a number of components with purported effects can be measured. Prunes contain dietary  fibre (according to four American studies: average 6.45 g/100 g, range 6.0–7.3 g/100 g) which  includes soluble and insoluble fibre, sorbitol (average from six sources/varieties 14.7 g/100 g, range  9.4-19.3 g/100 g), and phenolic compounds (ca. 184 mg⁄100 g) such as neochlorogenic and  chlorogenic acids. The water content of dried prunes is about 20-23 %5 (for data and references see  also: Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis et al., 2001; US Department of Agriculture, 2009).
The Panel considers that the food, prunes (dried plums of „prune‟ cultivars (Prunus domestica L.))  which is the subject of the health claim, is sufficiently characterised.
                 
                 
	        
        
        
        
                
2. Znaczenie oświadczenia dla zdrowia człowieka
                
                
                    The claimed effect, which is eligible for further assessment, is maintenance of normal bowel function.  The proposed target population is the general population.
Changes in bowel function such as reduced transit time, more frequent bowel movements, increased  faecal bulk or softer stools may be a beneficial physiological effect.
The Panel considers that maintenance of normal bowel function is a beneficial physiological effect.
                 
                 
	        
        
        
        
                
3. Naukowe uzasadnienia wpływu na zdrowie człowieka - Prawidłowe funkcjonowanie jelit
                
                
                    Sixteen references were cited to substantiate the claimed effect, of which three references report on  human intervention studies (Lucas et al., 2004; Tinker et al., 1991; Piirainen et al., 2007) whereas 13  references provide various background information.
One reference (Lucas et al., 2004) described an intervention study in which 58 post-menopausal  women not on hormone replacement therapy and free of any gastrointestinal and eating disorders  were randomised to consume either 100 g of dried plum (Prunus domestica L.) or 75 g of dried apples  daily for three months. The women were asked to fill out a validated questionnaire regarding their  weekly bowel habits. The parameters used to assess bowel habits included stool frequency, estimated  faecal bulk, consistency of stool (7-point scale), strain and pain during bowel movement, and feeling  of constipation after bowel movement. Thirty-eight women completed the study. The Panel notes that  no significant differences were found between the two treatment groups or between different time- points within each group.
A second paper (Tinker et al., 1991) reported on 41 adult men (29-79 years, mean 46.5 years)  recruited from the general population but with mild hypercholesterolaemia (fasting plasma cholesterol  concentration between 5.2 and 7.5 mmol/L). An 8-week open crossover study was performed (four
weeks with normal diet plus 12 prunes daily (~ 100g; ~6 g dietary fibre by analysis), and four weeks  with 360 mL grape juice per day). Biochemical parameters and faecal output were recorded. Faecal  wet weight as well as dry weight was higher after the prune period than after the grape juice period  and higher than baseline values, with no change in per cent water. The Panel notes that stool  consistency, stool frequency and flatulence did not differ between study periods, and that no method  for symptom record was provided.
A third paper (Piirainen et al., 2007) described a study with „prune juice‟ (prepared from plum juice  concentrate, prune puree, and water, and sweetened with fructose (7%)). The Panel notes that no  scientific conclusions can be drawn for the substantiation of the claim from this study that used  another food constituent for the intervention rather than dried “prunes”.
Two references provided are general reviews of evaluation and treatment of constipation in children,  two are reviews of carbohydrates in human nutrition and of tolerance of low-digestible carbohydrates,  three are listings of drugs/remedies or plant-based medications, one is a listing of fruit portion sizes,  one is a review of carbohydrate composition of plum and prune preparations (Dikeman et al., 2004),  one is an extensive review of chemical composition and potential health effects of prunes and prune  juice (Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis et al., 2001), one is a study on spent grain dietary fibre, two are clinical  studies on fibre intake in general, faecal excretion and colonic function. The Panel notes that these  references do not provide scientific data that could be used to substantiate the claim.
In weighing the evidence, the Panel took into account that one human intervention study did not find  any significant difference between the two treatment groups or between different time-points within  each group and that the other human intervention study showed some effect on faecal bulk but not on  stool frequency or consistency. Another human intervention study cited used another food constituent  for the intervention rather than dried “prunes” and the other references provided only background  information and did not provide scientific data that could be used to substantiate the claim.
The Panel concludes that the evidence provided is insufficient to establish a cause and effect  relationship between the consumption of dried plums of „prune‟ cultivars (Prunus domestica L.) and  maintenance of normal bowel function.
                 
                 
	        
        
        
        
                
4. Uwagi do zaproponowanego brzmienia oświadczenia
                
                
                    The Panel considers that the following wording reflects the scientific evidence: “Dried plums/prunes  can contribute to normal bowel function”.
                 
                 
	        
        
        
        
                
5. Warunki i możliwe ograniczenia stosowania oświadczenia
                
                
                    The Panel considers that, in order to obtain the claimed effect, about 100 g of dried plums (prunes)  should be consumed daily. The target population is the general population.
                 
                 
	        
        
Warunki i możliwe ograniczenia stosowania oświadczenia
Beneficial when regularly ingested
Prune juice only provides fibre if it contains prune pulp or puree.
Excessive consumption may cause diarrhoea.
Gradually increase intake.
Combine with adequate fluid intake and activity levels.
Product must contain Product must contain at least 3g fibre/100g.